5 Reasons Why Borders Lost $4 Billion

Did you know that at its peak, Borders Loyalty program had 23 Million Subscribers?

Tom and Louis Borders, two brothers from Ann Arbor Michigan, founded Borders as a used bookstore with a simple vision to create a space for book lovers.
​

The Physical stores, instantly filled in a gap in the market and led to expansion throughout the United States and internationally, establishing Borders as a household name in book retail.

Recognising the growing importance of e-commerce, Borders launched Borders.com to compete with online retailers like Amazon.

Value Proposition:

• Offered a wide array of books, music, and multimedia products, both in-store and online, catering to diverse consumer interests.
  ​
• Borders.com aimed to replicate the personalised service of their physical stores by providing tailored book suggestions. The website featured book reviews, author interviews, and interactive forums to build a community of readers.
  ​
• Efforts were planned to integrate loyalty programs across channels, although execution lacked seamless integration.

​

Financial Performance:

• By Mid 2000s, Borders peaked in annual revenue at $4 billion across all operations, online sales contributed less than 5% of total revenue, at this point.
  ​
• At this time, The company operated over 1,300 stores worldwide, including Borders, Walden books, and other subsidiaries.
  ​
• Its loyalty program attracted over 40 million members, aiming to drive repeat business and enhance customer engagement.

​

​

But then a Miscalculation triggered the fall of this $4 Billion Giant:

Amidst its ongoing issues and pressures to turn around the fortunes of its Ecommerce arm, In 2001, Borders turned to Amazon.com and outsourced its e-commerce operations to Amazon.com.
​

Under this arranagement :

• Amazon became the seller of record for all online sales.
• Borders received only referral fees from Amazon.
• Borders got revenue only when customers chose in-store pickup after online purchases.

​

By this decision, Borders single handedly destroyed any chance that they might have had at growing its online presence, as they relinquished control over its online presence to a direct competitor.

Needless to say, Amazon capitalised on this, strengthening its position and drawing customers away from Borders
​

Around 2005, After continuously ignoring Market trends, Borders realised that its facing a decline. Shoppers were browsing books at Borders but purchased them on Amazon.

5 Mistakes that cost $4 Billion to Borders:

1. Outsourcing Online Operations to Amazon: By allowing Amazon to manage Borders.com, company ceded control over its online customer experience, data, and strategic direction.
   ​Impact: Brand Dilution, Customers were redirected to Amazon’s platform, weakening Borders’ brand identity in the online space.
   ​
2. Delayed Digital Transformation: Borders were slow to recognise the significance of e-books and digital readers, and lagged behind competitors like Amazon’s Kindle and Barnes & Noble’s Nook.
   ​Impact: Lack of Product Innovation: Borders relied on selling third-party devices rather than developing its own e-reader, limiting its ability to capture market.
   ​
3. Poor Online Strategy: The website lacked the seamlessness in UI & UX as compared to its competitors, leading to poor customer experience.
   ​Impact: Bad Positioning, Borders failed to leverage digital marketing effectively to attract and retain online customers.
   ​
4. Financial Mismanagement: Aggressive expansion led to high fixed costs, significant debt burdens, and reduced financial flexibility.
   ​Impact: Inventory Misalignment, Overstocking and poor inventory management resulted in excessive discounts and decreased profitability.
   ​
5. Ignoring Consumer Behaviour: Amazon’s convenience, competitive pricing, and vast selection drew customers away from Borders.
   ​Impact: Poor Market Strategy, Borders underestimated the increasing popularity of digital media and failed to predict the slow-down in demand for physical books and music.